Skip to main content

Mayor Doesn’t Know His Water

October 30 2014
Written by Louise Stone.

VOICES-From the Mayor's statement, (see CityWatch “Can We Afford the Mayor’s Water Conservation Mandate”) it is obvious he knows not the difference between irrigation water and drinking water. Irrig ation water does not enter the sewer system but becomes groundwater. We here in the state of California already are conserving 20% and only using our irrigation water 3 times per week; or does this Mayor not listen to the elected Governor's mandates.

I remember the days when this Mayor was a Councilman and he was most enthusiastic about Neighborhood Councils. It seems that enthusiasm was based on his intention to run for Mayor and not heartfelt. The reason for that thought is that this Mayor totally ignores the NCs in preparation for this conservation mandate.

Whether the Mayor wants to acknowledge the NCs or not, the NCs are key in the City of Los Angeles. The NCs are a communication key of city government as well as a very ardent watchdog. Why the change once elected?

Has this Mayor consulted with his appointed advisors about the cost burden of this policy to his constituents? Maybe he needs to take the class currently at CSUN that deals with just that subject -- or the Mayor can send one of his advisors to take the class so that this information can be on more solid ground. This Mayor must have thought about it in the shower one morning and had an "ah-ha" moment.

This Mayor's "ah-ha" moment is half-baked. His water conservation mandate is hollow and without adequate research. His "ah-ha" moment is not worth the cost to his constituents. Where are rebates from the DWP for the property owners in the City of Los Angeles? What other incentive programs will be made available while his constituents try to figure out how to accomplish such a dream of the Mayor? Why did the Mayor not consult with the PR department at the DWP on how to "sell" this idea? Why did this Mayor leave the Neighborhood Councils out of the consideration of this
mandate and conveying information to the constituents?

I can not even take this Mayor's "ah-ha" moment seriously because I have not been given enough information to determine whether this is a good thing, a bad thing, or just another fantasy of an elected.

Go back to bed, Mayor.

 

(Louise Stone lives in Los Angeles.)

-cw

  

CityWatch

Vol 12 Issue 88

Pub: Oct 31, 2014

 

{module [862]}
{module [662]}

Get The News In Your Email Inbox Mondays & Thursdays


Featured CityWatch Stories

OP-ED - I am writing to my neighbors over my deep concern about the candidacy of Marissa Roy for Los Angeles City Attor…
NICK’S VIEW - Los Angeles needs purposeful, decisive leadership. Without it, the city risks sleepwalking into crisis. T…
MARSY'S LAW - Imagine a 54-year-old man fixates on your child. He won't stop. Then he turns on you and the rest of your…
THE BOTTOM LINE - Los Angeles has enough serious problems without turning the race for mayor into a social-media circus…
WEST BANK - There are crimes that arrive with explosions, and crimes that advance quietly—through a bulldozer at dawn…