Skip to main content

Clinton vs. Warren: The Best Bet?

January 02 2014
Written by Lou Siegel.

LABOR LOU-I prefer Elizabeth Warren to Hillary Clintonbut I’m not willing to risk the election on a Warren candidacy. 

In the primaries, Clinton will try to convince democrats that she has a lock on the electoral map and, as president, will use her political skills and guile to beat up republicans.  Implicit in her message will be Barack Obama’s strategic failure against a vile and vicious opposition. 

 

Warren, if she decides to go, will be cast as a brilliant and noble true-believer who has never been tested at the highest level. Democrats will be told that we can’t afford to nominate or elect another leader not ready for prime time. 

Ironically, I think Warren would have had a better chance if the democratic front-runner was a man. 

Our party and nation seem inclined to elect a woman president.   If her health holds up, Hillary Clinton is probably our best bet.

 

(Lou Siegel works in the labor movement and blogs at LaborLou.com where this column was first posted.)

-cw

 

 

CityWatch

Vol 11 Issue 1

Pub: Jan 3, 2014

Get The News In Your Email Inbox Mondays & Thursdays


Featured CityWatch Stories

HOMELESSNESS - Los Angeles’s homelessness program is in complete disarray, undermined by systemic gridlock, structural…
WESTSIDE - As of September 27, 2026, Karen Bass is in a substantially weaker position than she was entering the June pr…
THE NAVARRO REPORT - Last month, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved a $12.5 million settlement over t…
THE WORKPLACE - On Sept. 8, the Los Angeles City Council voted to get one step closer to expanding Fair Work Week to fa…
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY - Years ago, I was shooting ringside as a boxing photographer when I noticed Sylvester Stallone s…