Skip to main content

Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics

May 20 2013
Written by Sara Roos.

MUSE WITH ME - I listened to LAUSD’s head honcho call himself a “numbers guy” recently: “…mathematics, chemistry, physics – I get that; I’m a numbers guy”. With breath-taking self-righteousness for one with such shady academic credentials, he asserts the common, insidious mistake of believing that just because some concept is quantified it holds inherent meaning. 

Sure, numbers can be manipulated. And mathematical models can be built to parse its constituent components. That’s what statisticians do – they try to identify all the bits that together compose reality. 

 

But those constituent components – which are just numbers – have to themselves have some tie to reality. Without knowing what a number represents – what it measures, how and why – without that backward tie to reality, any mathematical modeling has no practical interpretation, no meaning. 

So numbers guys can do all the numbers-manipulation they want, all the mathematical modeling and calculating that so intimidates far too many. But in the end the interpretation of numbers that do not measure a parameter accurately, amounts to just so much magical thinking. 

And therein lies the difference between a numbers guy, who admires numbers for their purity alone, and a statistician, who searches for a valid mathematical argument to capture reality. And, by the way, it is the difference between these two that provides cover for the public’s disdain for statistics. (Ethical) Statisticians do not lie with numbers, people with statistical software do. 

Of course this all matters, a lot. When the entire enterprise of a school, including its “permission” to expand, its teachers’ livelihood, its students’ educational future, its community’s integrity — when all this is dependent on some one number like, say, API or a “proficiency” score improvement over a short period of time, that number had better represent some clear, uncontroversial metric of excellence. 

But it doesn’t. It is folly to attribute a false degree of objectivity to an undertaking as inherently subjective and transcendental as ‘Education’. Else, one day you awaken to discover the educational landscape revolutionized, and to no good end.

 

(Sara Roos is a politically active resident of Mar Vista, a biostatistician, the parent of two teenaged LAUSD students and a CityWatch contributor, who blogs at redqueeninla.wordpress.com

-cw

 

CityWatch

Vol 11 Issue 41

Pub: May 21, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Get The News In Your Email Inbox Mondays & Thursdays


Featured CityWatch Stories

WESTSIDE - Currently larger than 40 states in terms of population with roughly 10 million residents, Los Angeles County…
Yom Kippur demands more than personal repentance. At a defining moment for Jews everywhere, it asks whether we have tru…
ANNEXATION - The vision of “Greater Israel” draws on maximalist readings of biblical verses, especially Genesis 15:18–2…
NETANYAHUISM - The next Israeli election may be about something larger than Benjamin Netanyahu. For the first time in a…
LA TRANSPO - For anyone traversing the San Fernando Valley, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: Los Angeles is sp…