POLITICS - The sad story of how the Democratic political establishment unhorsed liberal activist Molly Munger and her ballot measure is really proof once again, if we needed it, that amateurs don’t belong in California politics.
You may recall that when the Secretary of State listed the ballot measures for the November ballot, Gov. Jerry Brown’s tax increase measure mysteriously appeared higher on the ballot than Molly Munger’s tax measure for education. Munger cried foul, and sued.
She was right, of course, she was screwed by the Secretary of State and the local registers of voters who saw to it that Jerry’s measure was counted first even though it was filed later and needed more signatures.
But on Monday, a judge threw out her suit on the not unreasonable ground that he could not micromanage how election clerks do their business. But what is surprising is that her attorneys apparently never raised the much stronger argument that the legislature schemed to put Brown initiative on the top of the ballot (something the clerks could not have done) by a phony budget trailer bill.
Since the budget trailer bill was never litigated, (although a lawsuit was filed late yesterday), Brown’s measure will be first on the ballot; and whether it passes or not, Munger’s measure is dead.
Brown’s measure will now be Proposition 30, top of the ballot, Munger’s will be Proposition 38, third from the bottom. What possibility is there that Proposition 38 is going to get more “yes.” votes than Proposition 30? That’s right, pretty slim.
But there is a silver lining for the business community in all this. Thanks to the effort of the clerks, Secretary of State and legislature to put Brown first, they also left the corporate tax increase sponsored by another naïve amateur, venture capitalist Tom Steyer, near the bottom as Proposition 39, and it polls very poorly now.
The Democrats in the legislature say they want the additional funds in this corporate tax increase, but they pretty much assured its defeat by their re-ranking of the ballot measures.
But the real goal here was to defeat Munger, and make her initiative irrelevant, which they did. Much as the legislature wants Brown’s to pass, being first does not assure the voters will vote “yes” on a controversial initiative.
In 2010, marijuana legalization was first on the ballot and it failed. Brown may do marginally better in this position, but passage of his tax increase is anything but assured no matter where it appears on the ballot.
But the Big Bad Wolf did succeed in one way; it gobbled down Little Red Molly Hood.
(Tony Quinn is a political commentator and former legislative staffer. This column was first posted at foxandhoundsdaily.com) –cw
Tags: Tony Quinn, politics, California, Molly Munger, ballot measure, Jerry Brown
CityWatch
Vol 10 Issue 56
Pub: July 13, 2012
Featured CityWatch Stories
Karen Bass Matters - Stop the DSA
I WON’T BE SILENT - Full disclosure: I can’t vote for mayor of Los Angeles because I live in Beverly Hills. But I am as…
Marissa Roy: The Other Face of Gascón
Los Angeles voters rejected George Gascón's progressive prosecution experiment in 2024. Now, a City Attorney candidate…
Airbnb’s Funding of Mayor Bass Raises the Specter of a Pay‑to‑Play Ploy
ELECTION 2026 - Los Angeles has been shaken by a powerful corporation pouring money into Mayor Karen Bass’s campaign in…
Do We Want A Governor, or An Underground Pawn, in Sacramento?
ALPERN AT LARGE - Let’s be honest—Steve Hilton wants Californians to learn more about what he proposes, and Xavier Bece…
ADUs: A New Weapon for Landlords to Create Turmoil and Hardship for Tenants
ADU'S - Renters Are at Risk of Losing Their Vital Parking Spaces
A new and expanding issue is emerging for renters thr…








