fbpx

Finally! A Better Way to Get Voter$ to the Polls

VOICES - Los Angeles City doled out $5,846,645.11 in matching funds for the March 5th primary election! Even though the total amount spent by candidates in this election exceeded $26,000,000 — voter turnout was only 16.11%. Out of 1,817,107 registered voters in the City of Los Angeles, only 292,760 ballots were actually cast. 

Based on the ballots counted so far, Wendy Greuel was at $93 Per Vote and Eric Garcetti was at $53 Per Vote. My campaign for City Controller was at 20 Votes Per Dollar. 

 

If our public matching funds were used to incentivize participation as opposed to finance campaigns, turnout would be higher. Instead of giving my tax dollars to my opponents because I did not raise enough money, public financing of elections should mean that the city makes it easier to vote for those not likely to vote. 

We spent over $6,000,000 of our Tax-Dollars on the March 5th Primary election (poll workers, materials, matching funds, etc.), and only generated 292,000 votes. A better use of money would be to pay people to vote or to pay people to count votes. We invest money in electronic machines that scan votes quickly, but what is more sacred to a democracy than counting votes by hand? 

If the money given to the candidates through the Los Angeles City Public Matching Funds System were distributed to the 292,000 people that voted, voters would have gotten $20, each. Instead we give millions of dollars to a few well-financed politicians. 

Unfortunately we have a public matching funds system that clearly favors the best-financed candidates and does nothing to increase voter turnout. The 19 best-financed candidates got $4,849,000 in public matching funds, the middle 15 candidates received less than $1,000,000, and the bottom 24 candidates got nothing. 

Public Matching Funds should be used to engage the citizenry and generate civic participation, not flood the airwaves and mailboxes of most-likely-voters with empty rhetoric and campaign promises. 

Instead of aligning City elections with Federal elections or implementing Rank Choice Voting, we should start with changing the City’s Public Matching Funds System to benefit the citizenry instead of career politicians.

 

(Ankur Patel is a neighborhood council activist and was a candidate for City Controller on March 5.)

-cw

 

 

CityWatch

Vol 11 Issue 26

Pub: Mar 26, 2013