Last updateWed, 25 Nov 2015 5pm

LOS ANGELES Monday, November 30th 2015 12:45

  • Please Don’t Pass the Plastic Salt and Pepper

    Christian Cristiano
    WELLNESS--A recent study by East China Normal University in Shanghai has proven that there are micro-particulates of plastic occurring in table salt…
  • New Drug for Alzheimer’s Fountain of Youth?

    Christian Cristiano
    WELLNESS-Alzheimer’s is a neurodegenerative disease that starts slowly and gets worse over time and affects over 5 million Americans and 35 million…
  • Are We Poisoning Our Babies?

    Christian Cristiano
    WELLNESS--Most people think that if there is pollution in the air they need to protect their lungs. A new study has found that when it comes to…

Mr. CityWatch Visits NoHo Arts District

LADWP Power Rates Overview





Sign Company Lobbyists Raining Big Bucks on City Hall

BILLBOARD WATCH - Billboard companies and others with a vested interest in sign regulations spent more than $1.1 million lobbying city councilmembers and other city officials in 2011, according to reports filed with the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission.
The big spender in the effort to influence those officials was Clear Channel, which paid lobbying firms almost $427,878. Payments reported to the Ethics Commission by other sign companies were:

Martin Outdoor $220,000

Regency Outdoor $124,969

Van Wagner $117,337

CBS Outdoor $112,645

Lamar Advertising $55,622

National Promotions $46,840

Norman Bus Bench $41,445

Creative Outdoor $15,097

An obvious item of major interest to Clear Channel, CBS Outdoor, Lamar Advertising and others was the citywide sign ordinance approved by the City Council’s PLUM committee late last year.  Three other companies–Martin Outdoor, Norman Bus Bench, and Creative Outdoor–were bidders on a new bus bench advertising contract approved by the City Council earlier in the year.

Non-sign companies seeking large entitlements from the city for signage also spent big on lobbying in 2011, although the Ethics Commission reports do not reflect a breakdown between lobbying on signage and other development issues.

The developers of downtown’s new Wilshire Grand project, Hanjin International and Thomas Properties Group, together paid $198,000 to lobbying firms. In addition to entitlements needed for the $1 billion-plus project, the companies successfully sought approval for large amounts of digital signage to display commercial advertising on the building’s facade.

But that amount pales in comparison to $1.877 million reported by lobbying firms representing AEG, the owner of Staples Center and L.A. Live. The company, which is seeking the city’s approval of its plan to build a new NFL football stadium next door to the city convention center, has proposed more than 50,000 sq. ft. of billboards on the convention center facade as well as advertising signage on and around the stadium.

(Dennis Hathaway is the president of the Coalition to Ban Billboard Blight. He can be reached at

Tags: Dennis Hathaway, billboards, Los Angeles, lobbyists, billboard lobbyists, Clear Channel, Ethics

Vol 10 Issue 11
Pub: Feb 7, 2012